considerations when choosing vegetation

When including plants, small shrubs, and trees in the outdoor play space, it is important to evaluate the durability and ideal weather conditions of the plant, as well as toxicity of leaves/flowers, and choking hazards.

Here are some resources that may assist you when you are choosing what greenery to include in your outdoor learning space:

 

http://illinoispoisoncenter.org/plant-list

This website provides a rating (on a scale of 0-3) of over 600 plants, based on their toxicity.

 

http://www.ohsu.edu/xd/outreach/oregon-poison-center/upload/Non-Toxic-Plants.pdf

A list of non-toxic plants

 

http://www.aboutkidshealth.ca/En/HealthAZ/SafetyandtheEnvironment/Poisoning/Pages/Plant-safety.aspx

General information on plant safety with children, includes list of common poisonous and non-poisonous plants.

 

http://www.kidsgardening.org/node/11522

Great site that outlines which plants are annuals, biennials, and perennials, as well as what plants are best to grow in the cool and warm seasons.

 

http://www.countryliving.com/gardening/garden-ideas/g1654/best-plants-for-a-garden/

This list provides a list of easy to care for, hardy plants that will give you the most bang for your buck.

 

 

outdoor art centres

All children are artists, and here are a handful of ways that you can inspire creativity and art-making in your outdoor learning space. If you want to check out more creative outdoor play ideas, I found all of these at the websites below:

http://www.naturalbeachliving.com/2015/08/amazing-outdoor-play-spaces.html

http://www.craftiments.com/2013/06/NatureWeavingCraftandSolarOvenSmores.html

http://www.letthechildrenplay.net/2012/03/bark-painting-at-preschool.html

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 4.12.33 PM
Great fine motor activity!
Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 4.12.49 PM
Let nature be your canvas!
Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 4.14.00 PM
Love the idea of having easels outside – I would even put mine in a grassy area or by plants and trees
Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 4.14.36 PM
Outdoor chalkboard

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 4.15.14 PM

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 4.15.39 PM
This picture made me think of painting on rocks, concrete, bark, etc. using water as paint!
Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 4.15.54 PM
Geoboards with nails in stumps and elastics!

mud kitchens

A kitchen/house area is such a staple in pre-school program. Here are some ideas, taken from this website, on how to bring this versatile and practical centre into the outdoor classroom space.

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 4.04.22 PMScreen Shot 2016-04-09 at 4.04.35 PM

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 4.04.43 PM

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 4.05.11 PM
How cute are these for children to learn how to set a table?!

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 4.05.19 PMScreen Shot 2016-04-09 at 4.05.29 PM

This one (above) is probably one of my favourites. I love the softness of putting the outdoor kitchen in a grassed/treed in area.

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 4.05.35 PM
Tires are so versatile – love the idea to place a large bowl into them to make a sink or mixing spot.

types of playgrounds

Types of playgrounds:

  1. Traditional playgrounds

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 3.41.47 PM

-stationary metal equipment (slides, monkey bars, etc.)

-foster physical play at the expense of social play

-still the most common type

  1. Contemporary playgrounds

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 3.42.15 PM

-improved traditional playgrounds

-climbing equipment, play houses (ladders and bridges), monkey bars, swing sets, wheeled vehicle areas, sandboxes, picnic tables, etc.

  1. Adventure playgrounds

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 3.43.31 PM

-constructed from natural environment

-flexibility: children can change the environment and the set up of the materials presented

-considered dangerous and visually unattractive by some

-space for games, cooking, garden, construction, etc.

Children’s Preferences

  • Swings over stationary equipment (experience force and motion, able to manipulate and move)
  • Sand and open areas are popular choices
  • Loose parts and wheeled vehicles

 

All information taken from the article:

Holmes, R. M. & Procaccino, J. K. (2009). “Preschool children’s outdoor play area preferences.” Early Child Development and Care, 179(8), 1103-1112.

 

oneness with nature: combat the ‘de-naturing of childhood’

This post is a summary of the article (cited below). It was a study on two different childcare centres, one that had an outdoor play environment, and one that had no outdoor space whatsoever, but a large room with equipment for children to play on. Not surprisingly, the findings pointed to the numerous benefits of outdoor play, which I discuss in detail below.

Dowdell, K., Gray, T., & Malone, K. (2011). “Nature and its influence on children’s outdoor play.” Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 15(2), 24-35.

  • Cognitive benefits: awareness, reasoning, observation skills, creativity, concentration, and imagination
  • Physical benefits: improved coordination, balance, and agility
  • Health benefits: reduced sickness and speedier recovery (p. 24)

If there are so many benefits to being present in nature, why are children playing outdoors becoming an “endangered species” (p. 24)? Development of cities means that play areas aren’t as accessible, and parents are afraid of stranger danger and traffic (p. 25). Parents feel safer if students are playing in their own homes; even in their own backyards, however, children have less open grass space and more formalized play structures (p. 25). In addition, school-readiness pushes mean that children are spending less time just playing and being kids and more time doing academic and cognitive tasks. Technology also plays a role in this “de-naturing of childhood and nature deficit disorder” (p. 25).

Effects:

  • Diminished senses
  • Attention difficulties
  • Disassociation from nature (p. 25)

Outdoor play spaces feature:

  • Plasticity
  • Manpulability
  • Complexity
  • Open-endedness
  • Opportunities for problem solving and development of social competencies
  • Risk and unpredictability (p. 25)

Eliminating risk from playgrounds means that many students take unnecessary risks in order to make their play more exciting, which does not develop appropriate risk assessment skills. When risk is removed from outdoor play environments, you see the following effects in children:

  • Compromised development
  • Decreased physical exercise
  • Risk of obesity
  • Limited play opportunities (p. 25)

While it is important to have grass and open space, if this is the only thing that an outdoor learning space features, it will seem barren and boring (although this is often done in order to promote easier maintenance of the outdoor area). Additional elements should be added, however to create more opportunities for interaction with others and nature (p. 26).

participation of adults alongside children

This post contains quotes and my reflections from the article below:

Waller, T. (2014). “Voices in the park: Researching the participation of young children in outdoor play in early years settings.” Management in Education, 28(4), 161-166.

Tim Waller is a researcher who was part of an Outdoor Learning Project (OLP) within a daycare in England. He stated, “I seek to frame both adult and children’s participation as a spatial and relational process, and build on ideas which emphasize that participatory processes should have outcomes for children as well as adults, creating adults as a co-learners and co-interpreters” (p. 161). I found this quote thought-provoking for several reasons, the first being that he emphasized the participation of children and adults together to create the best experience within an outdoor play space. Adults can not be only listening and observing; they should be engaged in the play in order to make the children’s experiences richer and deeper.

I like that he called the process of participation spatial and relational; I think both of these things link nicely to Reggio Emilia. Spatial, to me, means that the environment (in this case, a natural one) is a teacher and has much to share with children as they discover and explore. Relational speaks to the fact that learning is social, and the relationships students make in these learning environments is a crucial aspect of their discovery. These relationships can be between students or students and teachers, and may also include self-discovery and building a knowing relationship with oneself. This quote really seems to capture that the outdoor learning space provides a very holistic approach to learning.

Finally, I enjoyed that Waller placed teachers/adults as “co-learners and co-interpreters.” This also reflects the ideals of Reggio Emilia and ECE in general: students have the freedom and capability to guide their own learning and teachers are simply there to be their partners in this learning.

Waller explained that the daycare would go to a separate natural environment by bus; it is unfortunate that they did not have their own outdoor learning space right in their daycare centre, but encouraging to note that they made this outdoor exploration a priority for their children. The children would have total freedom to engage with the environment and others as they pleased, and were encouraged to document their own experiences by taking photos and videos, as well as drawing pictures and maps of the space. When students preferred to fully engage, the teachers would document and observe the learning going on. Waller says that “The high staff–child ratio and the wide and varied space also afforded greater opportunity for child-led initiatives resulting from shared dialogue, which led to the construction of shared narratives around special places” (p. 163). It is clear that this daycare staff is doing outdoor learning right: they allow the children to choose their activities and then have conversations about what is taking/took place. This allowed the teachers at the daycare to learn more about the children’s interests and pathways to learning.

Waller cites financial cuts and the “school readiness agenda” as limitations to the OLP (p. 165-166). This reflects my own tensions with balancing holistic, play-based learning with the push of mainstream academic schooling to have early childhood students prepared to engage in more traditional and strict methods of learning.

In conclusion, Waller gives four categories that are important to consider when beginning to plan an outdoor play space, to which I have added my own questions that I would consider, in the brackets:

  1. allocation of the appropriate of resources to support learning in outdoor spaces (What physical equipment or tools do you need for students to engage in the space? What staffing numbers do you need? What funding might need to be in place to get this started?)
  2. sufficient staff time for documentation and reflection on pedagogy and practice (When and how will staff document student learning in the outdoor learning space? What tools do you need to complete this documentation – cameras, clipboards, folders, etc.?)
  3. staff development programmes to support the development of guided interaction and participatory processes with young children (How will the staff interact with learners in this space? To what degree will staff be involved? When do you let children play and when do you join in?)
  4. the need for senior staff to be strong advocates for ECEC and engage with policy-makers at local and national level (How will you defend the outdoor play space as a meaningful and important aspect of the ECE program? What challenges might you face in implementing and maintaining this type of learning environment? What regulations exist in regards to outdoor play spaces?)

educational philosophy analysis…

Throughout my degree, I have made several versions of my educational philosophy for different ECS courses. I decided to analyze each of these stages of my development in the program and see which parts of each version connect to outdoor learning…

1. ECS 100 (Fall 2012)

What a blast from the past! This document was written using “I Believe” statements and is the basis for a budding teaching philosophy from my VERY FIRST SEMESTER as a university student. I have highlighted (in yellow) the statements that I think connect to ECE and outdoor learning and elaborate a bit on why I think this is. I am happy to see that I had some strong beliefs at the very beginning of my degree.

ECS 100 Philosophy

2. ECS 200 (Winter 2014)

This second philosophy is written in paragraph form under the subheadings of 4 different questions. I created this at the very end of my second year of university. Again, I have highlighted parts that can connect to ECE and outdoor play space benefits. I was encouraged to see that the largest amount of yellow highlighting was in the “What do you believe about learners and the way they learn?” category.

ECS 200 Philosophy

3. Post-internship semester (Winter 2016)

Finally, this is the educational philosophy that I have created in this semester, post-internship. Again, it is encouraging to see that I have a lot of yellow highlighting in the beliefs about learners and how they learn portion. I found it interesting that I never explicitly talked about using the outdoor space as a learning environment, though. I think that this is something that I should consider adding to this work-in-progress document in the future.

Post-Internship Philosophy